The Iranian crisis: American Jews must stand and be counted
The announcement of the Lausanne joint statement concerning the framework of the U.S. deal with Iran highlighted the extent of President Barack Obama’s subterfuge and deception…writes Isi Leibler.
Isi Leibler
We also witnessed the blatant contempt of Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who rejected key components of the “agreements” and referred to America’s “devilish” objectives while his audience chanted “Death to America.” Yet Obama continued insisting that a genuine framework for a deal had been achieved and dismissed Khamenei’s remarks as merely for “domestic consumption.” He reiterated that Iran would not become a nuclear power “under his watch.”
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is now no longer a voice in the wilderness. There has been a surge of condemnations from wide sections of the media, including many liberal and even Obama stalwarts who, ironically, effectively vindicated Netanyahu’s congressional critique of the deal — which they had previously mocked.
The problem is that Obama and his acolytes refuse to face the reality that the Iranian regime is not merely a terrorist state but is controlled by messianic religious fundamentalist fanatics who, during the war against Saddam Hussein’s Iraq, systematically sacrificed 500,000 child soldiers carrying plastic keys to Paradise as they were “martyred.” Mutual assured destruction, which created the deterrence between the Soviets and the West during the Cold War, cannot be applied to leaders capable of launching a suicidal nuclear inferno to destroy Israel, content in the belief that they will be rewarded for their efforts with heavenly paradise.
However, the Iranians will in all likelihood ultimately accept the deal offered because it will relieve economic sanctions, transform them legally into a threshold nuclear state, and, according to Obama himself, provide the legitimacy to become a full-fledged nuclear power after 13 years. As former Secretaries of State Henry Kissinger and George Shultz wrote in The Wall Street Journal, “Negotiations … to prevent Iranian capability to develop a nuclear arsenal are ending with an agreement that concedes this very capability.”
The cynical decision by the Russians to already now lift the ban on providing the Iranians with the S-300 missile system further diminishes any prospects of influencing the duplicitous Ayatollah Khamenei to adhere to a meaningful agreement.
Only Congress can prevent the implementation of this shocking act of appeasement with its catastrophic global implications — and there are only a few weeks left to act. Proposed bills requiring congressional approval for the Iran deal and removal of sanctions are currently being debated and may be voted on this week.
In this context, the response of American Jews to Obama’s actions could be a crucial factor in determining the outcome.
There is already unprecedented tension evident among Jews who are shocked with their vindictive president’s determination to proceed with policies that amount to an abandonment of Israel.
Obama is sensitive to this and has suddenly become excessively solicitous, disingenuously expressing astonishment at those who felt that Israel was not close to his heart, making the cynical observation that a weakened Israel “would be a failure for my presidency.” What an extraordinary statement from a president who, for most of his term of office, has treated Israel worse than rogue states.
He also stated “that if anyone messes with Israel, America will be there.” Aside from being meaningless, taking account of Obama’s track record with his allies, this is a pathetic utterance.
Indeed, when in the midst of negotiations, the Iranian leaders reiterated that “the destruction of Israel is nonnegotiable,” Obama merely expressed regret, but refused to allow this to influence his position.
These developments have obliged even liberal Zionist Jews to admit the painful reality that their president has turned on Israel.
Yet some of Obama’s most fervid supporters are Jews or of Jewish origin. The most benign are schizophrenics who still love Israel but instead of criticizing the administration, vent their spleen on Netanyahu for his “extremism.”
The more vicious are the anti-Israel bashers and left-wing organizations such as J Street, which urge Obama to “punish Israel.” Obama’s verbal onslaughts provide grist for the mill of Jews promoting anti-Israel boycotts, divestment and sanctions, and those at the recent J Street conference, where one panel participant was applauded when she questioned the need to retain a Jewish state.
Few anti-Israel activists have a genuine Jewish background. The majority of the older elements are former communists and Bundists or their offspring who were always hostile to Zionism.
Among the youngsters, it is a reflection of demographic changes, with 80% of non-Orthodox Jews marrying non-Jews. They are misleadingly described as “secular” Jews, but in many cases, the only link to Judaism is one Jewish parent. Many have no ethnic ties or genuine feelings of affinity to Israel and most of their children will not even relate to anything Jewish.
Despite disproportionate exposure, one must not be misled into believing that vast numbers of American Jews are becoming anti-Israeli. The reality is that committed American Jews remain passionately supportive of Israel and, surprisingly, polls still show that they overwhelmingly support Netanyahu.
Regrettably, until recently the grass-roots support was not reflected in the mainstream leadership, which failed to respond publicly to the numerous indignities to which the prime minister of Israel was subjected by the U.S. administration and the unreasonable demands made of Israel, which has been treated far harsher than outright enemies of the U.S.
In general, Americans have no hesitation in condemning or protesting against their president when they disagree with him. Yet the traditionally feisty Jewish leadership which is deeply committed to Israel, with a few exceptions, behaved like “trembling Israelites,” reluctant to even respectfully criticize their president. This is a sad comment about American Jewry, which has always insisted that although in the Diaspora, it is not in galut (exile).
Eli Wiesel and a number of organizations such as the Zionist Organization of America and the Simon Wiesenthal Center spoke out when Netanyahu was excoriated by the administration for addressing Congress, but regrettably the mainstream leadership remained silent. Noting that even the Jews were not protesting his primitive insults to Netanyahu, Obama was encouraged to be even more vicious in his verbal attacks.
However, following his intense outrage in the wake of Netanyahu’s electoral victory and as Jews began to appreciate the extent of Obama’s capitulation to the Iranian terrorists, there appears to have been a sea change and the mainstream leadership has finally spoken out. While some of the “liberal” establishment, including the Reform and Conservative Jewish organizations, were at pains to display their bona fides to Obama by castigating Netanyahu, many of their rabbis did not share these views.
The American Israel Public Affairs Committee led the charge, criticizing Obama and lobbying Congress to toughen the deal with the Iranians. The Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations also expressed disapproval.
Other Jewish organizations followed. Abe Foxman, national director of the Anti-Defamation League, who had previously criticized Netanyahu and urged him to cancel his congressional visit, did not hold his punches. He considered the administration’s behavior “unbecoming” and was profoundly troubled by its reactions, which “raise deeper questions about their intentions and perspectives.”
David Harris, head of the American Jewish Committee, expressed “deep anxiety and puzzlement” and even accused Obama of “having a reasoned interest in prolonging the crisis” and of orchestrating a campaign “completely contrary to the spirit of U.S.-Israel relations.”
Rabbi Yitz Greenberg, a dove and supporter of leftist causes, accused Obama of creating an “existential threat to Israel” and made parallels with the Western betrayal of Czechoslovakia when he said, “Imagine if the U.S. Congress or the British Parliament had allowed Eduard Benes of Czechoslovakia to speak out against the Munich pact.”
This is indeed a time of reckoning, especially as the administration could also be on the verge of abandoning Israel diplomatically.
The unprecedented viciousness of the administration’s anti-Israel rhetoric may be a precursor to withholding its veto from the impending French U.N. resolution effectively recognizing a Palestinian state and negating Resolution 242 with a U.S. or a U.N. imposed settlement that would deny Israel defensible borders. The path would then be open for the Europeans, with the tacit support of the U.S., to commence orchestrating resolutions sanctioning Israel.
The extent to which American Jews raise their voices may have a major impact on the outcome of these developments, especially in relation to wavering Democratic congressmen. Senator Chuck Schumer, recently endorsed for the position of Senate Democratic leader following the 2016 congressional elections, seeks to portray himself as a Jewish “hawk” on Israel and Iran. He has indicated he will back the proposed bill requiring congressional approval of the Iran deal but his Jewish constituents should discourage him from sitting on the fence when it comes to lobbying his fellow Democrats to overcome Obama’s veto and review the unworkable agreement.
This is truly a time for American Jewish leaders to stand and be counted; the issues at stake will profoundly impact Israel’s security and could even have existential repercussions as well as a dismal outcome for the entire world. The indicators all suggest that American Jewish leaders have woken up and will not let Israel down.
Isi Leibler lives in Jerusalem. He is a former president of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry.
Isi,
I want to add to Gil’s comments by saying that I think it simplistic, divisive and even offensive to discuss Jewish anti-Israel activists in regard to their ‘Jewish background, implying that they are less Jewish due to communist background, secular leanings or having only one Jewish parent, et al. I am not defending anti-Israel sympathisers here, I am defending having the right to own being Jewish, which does not depend on these kinds of judgements, or should not.
There are all kinds of Jews, as we know. It is nobody’s right to deny their ethnicity. Coming from a traditional orthodox family upbringing does not make one a superior Jew. A Jewish soul can be inviolable and a Jewish heart beat hard and strong without that. If you’d had more experience of a diversity of Jews, you would know that, Isi. An article I read in ‘The Israel Times’ recently said that all the Jews thrown together in Auschwitz and other concentration camps were Jewish, without distinction – being orthodox or not made no difference there; the article was in relation to unity. Well, the anti-Israel Jews you’re speaking of are indeed causing disunity, but on a different spectrum, so are you.
That Jews betray their inheritance is one thing, and bad enough. But let’s not make unfair assumptions due to a distanced reading of demographics.
As for Jewish leadership in the U.S. being feisty, where is there evidence of that?
Isi,
Will you never face reality?
You say: “The problem is that Obama and his acolytes refuse to face the reality that the Iranian regime is not merely a terrorist state but is controlled by messianic religious fundamentalist fanatics.”
I hate to be the one to shatter your hallucinations but Obama and his “acolytes” know exactly what they are doing. It is the Jewish world and Israel that does not face reality and by you writing to the effect that if only Obama would wake up and see the light, things would be different, gives a false impression to many of your followers who do not know anything different.
Obama is a radical Muslim who has members of the Muslim Brotherhood in his administration as advisors, all working feverishly to the same end which is to bring Israel to its knees or its total destruction.
Netanyahu has got to get up off his knees and face reality.
He has got to cease the endless blabbering to a world that on the whole has no problem when contemplating a nuclear armed Iran.
Additionally, any plans he makes for a pre-emptive strike on all fronts should never be divulged to the USA as long as that abomination Barry Soetoro (aka Barack Obama) is President or it will turn into another Azerbaijan fiasco, or have you totally forgotten about this treachery carried out by the Obama administration?
Your comment that: “one must not be misled into believing that the vast numbers of American Jews are becoming anti-Israel” is clearly false.
American Jews on the whole are the morons of the Diaspora. Morons who voted not once but twice for Obama when the writing was clearly on the wall about his anti-Israel bias, his Islamic heritage, his Marxist beliefs and his lies as to his place of birth.
I am in regular contact with a member of an orthodox Synagogue in Florida who has over a short period advised me the following:
“I do not notice any perceived change in the perception of Obama by those who formerly voted for him. The majority of his fans are still staunch supporters. If one asks them why, they would rather talk of moving on to Hillary Clinton, the ‘next big thing.’ They are also staunch supporters of Hillary.”
“Talking of American Jews, they are Leftist first, before any other identity. Generally, they vote 70% – 80% for Democrats NO MATTER WHAT. In the 2008 Presidential election, 78% of Jews voted for Barack Obama and 69% voted for him in 2012.”
Then this:
“If Hillary runs for the Presidency, she is expected to get about 70% – 80% of the Jewish vote, no matter how dangerous she is to Israel.”
And then this disgraceful observation:
“Many of my co-congregants, including the retired Rabbi, are like many American Jews. They care far more about being liberals than they care about Israel or the US Constitution.”
So in summary Isi, now is not the time to have faith in American Jews doing anything.
Being the morons that they are, they will flock to Hillary Clinton’s side as they did to Obama even though her only claim to fame is that she was the wife of the last Democratic President who commanded a degree of respect at home and abroad, a President who did not spit on the Constitution he was duty bound to uphold.
In relation to Hillary Clinton readers should be aware of her stupidity during Israel’s recent war with Hamas, when she stated that Hamas stores its missiles in civilian population centres as “Gaza is a small place and there’s not much space to put them anywhere else.”
Finally, this woman like Obama, still babbles on about a two state solution when in reality how one can talk about a solution when talks have fallen in a heap from day one in spite of concession after useless concession having been made by that insane democracy called Israel, is mind boggling.