Same old media bias dredged up following Israeli reprisals after Gaza rocket barrage
While Israel absorbed as many as 700 rockets fired by the terrorist groups Hamas and Islamic Jihad from the Gaza Strip over the weekend, the media turned the tables on the aggression and launched its usual assault on the Jewish state.
Media representative broadcast from the Israel-Gaza border on the second day of “Operation Protective Edge,” July 9, 2014. Credit: Yonatan Sindel/Flash90.
“It’s Israel against Palestinian terrorists, so we always know which side the American media will take—the ‘terrorists,’ ” Dan Gainor, vice president of business and culture at the Media Research Centre, a media watchdog group, told JNS. “Except they won’t ever call them that. Fire 700 rockets indiscriminately trying to kill men, women and children, and the press labels you a ‘militant,’ as long as they support your cause.”
Gainor cited a “usual list of errors and fallacies—like how Gaza is ‘occupied’ or ‘surrounded’—neither of which is true. Israel pulled out of Gaza more than a decade ago and it was rewarded by the creation of a terror state.”
Israel withdrew from the Gaza Strip in 2005.
One straightforward headline in The New York Times in the past few days, “Gaza Militants Fire 250 Rockets, and Israel Responds With Airstrikes,” was attacked by Yousef Munayyer, executive director of the U.S. Campaign for Palestinian Rights, as “a stunningly irresponsible and misleading headline.” His complaint? That it wasn’t slanted in favour of the Palestinians.
That’s how uneven the playing field has become.
“Beyond just inaccurate, it is also dangerous. Israel’s violent oppression of Palestinians is enabled by media willing to tell a story in a way that always justifies Israeli violence at the expense of truth, accuracy and context,” said Munayyer in a subsequent tweet.
Beyond just inaccurate, it is also dangerous. Israel’s violent oppression of Palestinians is enabled by media willing to tell a story in a way that always justifies Israeli violence at the expense of truth, accuracy and context.
— (((YousefMunayyer))) (@YousefMunayyer) May 5, 2019
“It also highlights the orientalist lens thru which Western media covers Israel/Palestine, where Israeli life is considered far more valuable than Palestinian life. News always starts when Israeli life is threatened, while harm to Palestinian life is not news but ‘normal,’ ” added Munayyer.
“When will the world stop dehumanizing our Palestinian people who just want to be free? Headlines like this & framing it in this way just feeds into the continued lack of responsibility on Israel who unjustly oppress & target Palestinian children and families. #FreePalestine,” tweeted U.S. Rep. Rashida Tlaib, sharing Munayyer Twitter thread.
When will the world stop dehumanizing our Palestinian people who just want to be free? Headlines like this & framing it in this way just feeds into the continued lack of responsibility on Israel who unjustly oppress & target Palestinian children and families. #FreePalestine https://t.co/p3X3j8WtwM
— Rashida Tlaib (@RashidaTlaib) May 5, 2019
However, Sean Durns, senior research analyst at the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America, told JNS, “Several major Western media outlets have offered poor and biased coverage of the latest terrorist attacks targeting Israel. Several outlets failed to make clear to readers that Israel’s actions were a response to terrorists launching an unprecedented number of rockets into Israeli territory.”
He cited The Wall Street Journal, which published a story with the headline “Israel and Gaza Trade Deadly Attacks,” providing “readers false equivalency between the actions of a U.S.-designated terror group that targets Israeli civilians and uses human shields as cover—a double war-crime—and the Jewish state, which utilizes the Iron Dome defense system, targeted strikes and roof knocking, to minimize casualties.”
Durns added, “For its part, The Washington Post, CNN and others have continued to treat the Hamas-controlled Gazan Health Ministry as a credible source.”
Simon Plosker, managing editor for HonestReporting, a non-governmental organization that monitors anti-Israel media bias, told JNS that while the reporting on the conflict this time around was improved because four Israeli civilians were killed, leading to sympathy from the press, the coverage “also demonstrated the media’s consistently simplistic usage of casualty figures as a moral barometer,” citing the media expression “if it bleeds, it leads.”
“A number of British media outlets such as Sky News, ITV News and The Independent chose to lead with stories and headlines accusing Israel of killing a pregnant Palestinian woman and a baby,” said Plosker. “Aside from the deliberate intention to portray Israel as a murderous aggressor, in many cases the IDF’s denial of involvement and claim that a misfiring Hamas rocket was responsible wasn’t even deemed worthy of mention.”
“The media have a duty to report that the Palestinian claim was disputed by Israel. Anything less is a significant professional failure,” he continued. “Whether journalists believe the IDF’s statements or not, the media have a duty to report the story fully. Telling one side alone is willfully naive at best, and a worrying betrayal of the truth at worst.”
A ceasefire was agreed upon early Monday morning. Israel reportedly responded throughout the barrage by striking Hamas observation posts, warehouses and weapons’ facilities in Gaza.
Reports from Gaza indicate that 23 Gazans were killed and 60 wounded in the Israeli airstrikes.
