Russia Demands American Capitulation To Help Eradicate Islamic State…writes David Singer
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov has called on America to end its attempt to remove Syria’s President Assad from power in return for Russia’s co-operation to militarily confront Islamic State.
Lavrov reportedly told Bloomberg on 2 June 2015 :
“The U.S.’s “obsession” with [Syria’s President] Assad isn’t helping in the common fight against the threat from Islamic State…
“People put the fate of one person whom they hate above the fight against terrorism. Islamic State can go “very far” unless stopped, and air strikes alone “are not going to do the trick”
“If people continue to acquiesce with what is going on and continue to acquiesce with those who categorically refuse to start the political process until Bashar Assad disappears, then I’m not very optimistic for the future of this region…”
America is part of the Friends of Syria core group known as the London Eleven that has been assisting rebel forces in Syria attempting to overthrow Assad.
Assad – backed by Russia, Iran and Hezbollah – has rebuffed such attempts during four years of horrendous conflict that has so far seen over 220000 Syrians die, four million citizens made refugees and another 7.6 million internally displaced.
A report published by the UN in March 2015 estimated the total economic loss since the start of the conflict was $202bn and that four in every five Syrians were now living in poverty – 30% of them in abject poverty. Syria’s education, health and social welfare systems are also in a state of collapse.
America apparently intends to ignore Lavrov’s sage advice and continue to pursue its Syrian policy to oust Assad.
Marie Harf – a U.S. State Department spokeswoman told reporters in Washington that:
“we’re certainly not going to coordinate with a brutal dictator who’s massacred so many of his own citizens.”
“That’s just an absurd proposition. That’s certainly not going to happen.”
Lavrov’s comments come at a time when Islamic State – already controlling a large part of Syria and Iraq covering an area greater than the United Kingdom – continues to make further advances – recently seizing the city of Ramadi 110 kilometers west of the Iraqi capital –Baghdad – and capturing the strategic northern Syrian city of Palmyra – a World Heritage listed site containing the monumental ruins of one of the most important cultural centres of the ancient world.
Islamic State reportedly controls up to 80 per cent of oil fields in Syria and has destroyed and also sold looted antiquities in Hatra, Nimrod and Mosul to acquire a major source of its funding – sometimes for seven figure sums.
The American led coalition of some 62 States – meeting in Paris this week – has proved totally unable to stem the advance of Islamic State in its stated objective of restoring the Islamic Caliphate and Sharia law wherever it seizes territory.
Graeme Wood – a contributing editor at The Atlantic – sums up Islamic State’s vulnerability:
If it loses its grip on its territory in Syria and Iraq, it will cease to be a caliphate. Caliphates cannot exist as underground movements, because territorial authority is a requirement: take away its command of territory, and all those oaths of allegiance are no longer binding.”
Only a UN sanctioned military force can hope to achieve this objective.
Obama and Putin need to urgently do a deal that sees:
- A UN led process on the political future of Syria being undertaken without first removing Assad
- A UN Security Council Chapter VII Resolution passed under Article 42 of the UN Charter authorising military action against Islamic State.
Senseless head-butting needs to give way to sensible brain-storming.
It’s becomming clear that ISIS continues to expand because this suits US (Obama’s) interests. The ‘fight’ against ISIS is a lie manufactured by the US state Dept. ISIS have state of the art US military equiptment and film footage indicates troop formations, movements and tactics are ‘western’ in nature. They either have western mercenaries within them or covert US military personnel working along side them. The US state dept. has much past form in telling lies about its off-shore intentions. So don’t necessarily beleive the pictures of US planes dropping bombs that you see on mainstream news.
Well, thus far there’s not much sign of IS ‘actual’ vulnerability (vis a vis Graeme Wood’s conjecture) in relation to territory and land power. They’re not easily dislodged, and all the American planes flying in to do their bit is not the way to achieve it.