Penny Wong explains Australia’s UN abstention

September 19, 2024 by AAP
Read on for article

Australia abstained from a United Nations vote calling on Israel to end its “unlawful presence” in Palestine, the federal government has confirmed.

Penny Wong

In New York overnight, the United Nations General Assembly  adopted a Palestinian-drafted resolution demanding Israel end “its unlawful presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory” within 12 months.

The resolution received 124 votes in favour while 43 countries – including Australia – abstained and Israel, the United States and 12 others voted no.

Asked if Australia abstained to appease Israel, Foreign Affairs Minister Penny Wong told ABC radio the government looked very carefully at the resolution.

Australia wanted to vote for a resolution that reflected closely the July opinion of the International Court of Justice, that said Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territories and settlements was illegal and should be withdrawn, she said.

“We worked very hard in New York, with others including the Palestinian delegation, to seek amendments that would enable us to support it as we did the recognition vote and the ceasefire vote, where the text enabled Australia to support it,” Senator Wong said on Thursday.

“We were disappointed that the amendments that we and many others sought were not accepted.

“For that reason we abstained.”

The World Court opinion said Israel’s withdrawal should be done “as rapidly as possible,” while the General Assembly resolution imposes a 12-month deadline.

The General Assembly resolution also called on states to “take steps towards ceasing the importation of any products originating in the Israeli settlements, as well as the provision or transfer of arms, munitions and related equipment to Israel … where there are reasonable grounds to suspect that they may be used in the Occupied Palestinian Territory”.

Senator Wong said Australia does not supply weapons to Israel.

“We have imposed sanctions of a range of extremist settlers and we will deny any extremist settlers a visa to Australia,” she said.

“So there are things in the resolution we have already done.

“We wish we were in a position to have been able to support it, but like the United Kingdom and Canada and Germany, we were not able to support and therefore we have abstained.”

with Reuters

Comments

One Response to “Penny Wong explains Australia’s UN abstention”
  1. dsinger2000 says:

    Penny Wong says:
    “Australia wanted to vote for a resolution that reflected closely the July opinion of the International Court of Justice, that said Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territories and settlements was illegal and should be withdrawn”

    She obviously is unaware that this opinion:
    1. was an advisory opinion that is not binding
    2. failed to recognise or mention the rights vested in the Jewish people to reconstitute the Jewish National Home in these territories – Judea and Samaria (West Bank) – under articles 6 and 25 of the 1922 League of Nations Mandate for Palestine – as preserved by Article 80 of the United Nations Charter.
    3. incorrectly concluded that Jewish settlements in these territories are illegal when in fact they are legal and have been established in accordance with the legal rights vested in the Jewish people as enumerated in 2 above.

    Is our Foreign Minister and her office so ignorant of these basic legalities?

    Get your department to check them out Minister and come back here and apologise for your ignorance.

    The UN has become the epicentre of world wide Jew-hatred in claiming Jews have stolen someone else’s land when it was specifically designated for the Jewish people by the League of Nations.

    Australia should have voted “No”

Speak Your Mind

Comments received without a full name will not be considered
Email addresses are NEVER published! All comments are moderated. J-Wire will publish considered comments by people who provide a real name and email address. Comments that are abusive, rude, defamatory or which contain offensive language will not be published

Got something to say about this?

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Discover more from J-Wire

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading