NZ Labour MP deletes incendiary pro-Hamas retweet
New Zealand’s ACT party has demanded the resignation of a Labour foreign spokesman for retweeting a statement justifying Hamas’ attack on Gaza.
On Sunday, Damien O’Connor, the former trade minister and a long-serving Labour MP based on South Island, reposted an edited speech by retired US military official Lawrence Wilkerson.
“Palestinians have every right to do whatever they did on October 7th,” Mr Wilkerson said in the post.
More than 1100 people were killed, mostly Israeli citizens, and about 250 hostages were taken in Hamas’ surprise attack on October 7, 2023, which led to the current Israel-Hamas war.
ACT foreign affairs spokesman Simon Court said republishing the post was a sackable offence.
“Mr O’Connor thinks Hamas is cool,” he told AAP.
“A Labour Party foreign affairs spokesperson has justified the largest Jewish pogrom since the holocaust … there is no way (Labour leader) Chris Hipkins can let this extreme and hateful statement stand.”
Following criticism, Mr O’Connor deleted the post, but in a party-provided statement, he said he did not resile from his views.
“It’s intolerable to see civilians continue to suffer disproportionately as innocent victims in this conflict,” he said, calling on the government to recognise Palestine and to support the ICJ case brought against Israel.
A Labour spokeswoman said Mr O’Connor would not face sanction after “acknowledging his mistake and removing the retweet himself”.
Mr O’Connor has been Labour’s strongest pro-Palestinian voice since the war began.
In December, he made an impassioned and incendiary parliamentary address, labelling Israel’s military response as a genocide.
“I call upon Israel, a nation that has been set up and seeks sympathy and support because of the Holocaust and the outrageous outcomes, I call on that nation to look at itself and apply the same humanity to the people of Palestine,” he said.
“Bombing and killing and slaughtering women and children that have nothing to do with this other than happening to be born as a Palestinian, that is outrageous.”
The death toll in Gaza has doubled since that speech, with more than 40,000 Palestinians, including 16,500 children, killed by Israel.
New Zealand’s position on the conflict has returned to the fore domestically following a vote in favour of Palestinian rights at the United Nations earlier in September.
Foreign Minister Winston Peters said the decision was based on NZ’s support for international law, adding he thought Israel’s retaliatory attacks had “gone far too far”
Before taking the vote, Mr Peters, the leader of NZ First, consulted with Prime Minister Chris Luxon, the leader of the National party, leaving the third coalition member, ACT, in the cold.
In his first direct criticism of Israel since the war began, Mr Luxon said Israel’s military action had been “disproportionate” to the attack.
Mr Court, the strongest voice in support of Israel in parliament, disagreed with the prime minister on whether Israel’s response was disproportionate.
“I don’t think so when we consider that they still have many, many foreign nationals and Israelis held hostage and they’ve been under constant attack since October 8,” he told AAP.
“Nothing that I’ve seen that Israel is carrying out indiscriminate bombings and killings.
“Information very strongly shows they are targeting terrorists (who are) using civilians as human shields.
“Israel has not sought to threaten or harm the people in these territories, they have sought to (deal with) the terrorist organisations.
“I personally believe Israel is on the right side of history.”
The New Zealand Jewish Council has said that “Whatever they did” was breaching a ceasefire to invade sovereign territory, massacring 1200 people (mostly civilians), burning alive whole families, raping women, beheading corpses, and taking over 200 hostages to Gaza (over 100 of whom remain), in the gleeful attempt to enforce the genocidal charter of Hamas, a proscribed terrorist group in New Zealand.
In a media release, the NZJC reported: “On X (formerly Twitter) this morning, Damien O’Connor reposted a statement of questionable provenance purporting to be from the former Chief of Staff to the United States Secretary of State claiming that the actions taken by Hamas terrorists on October 7 were justified. On further investigation, it appears that Mr O’Connor regularly shares content from some of the most notorious accounts on X, including far-right extremists and pro-Putin propagandists.
We wish to remind Mr O’Connor that, since October 7, Jews in New Zealand have suffered increasing numbers of antisemitic attacks – both physical and verbal, including in schools.
We request that Chris Hipkins, as leader of the opposition, confirm whether it is, in fact, the official Labour Party position that the October 7 massacre was justified.”
Juliet Moses, President of the NZJC, said: “To see someone in O’Connor’s position justifying the worst slaughter of Jews since the Holocaust is horrifying to Jewish New Zealanders and should be repugnant to all people of conscience in this country. Deleting one post, as Mr O’Connor has now done without apology, is wholly insufficient. Chris Hipkins must explain his party’s position, and how someone with such hateful views and poor judgement can hold a senior position in Foreign Affairs in the Labour Party.”
Many, many New Zealanders are ashamed of the present politicians. They are a disgrace to the nation and certainly not representative of the voice and convictions of the average New Zealander. They all have blood-stained hands.
Bobby Meyer
The NZ National Party co-sponsored UN Resolution 2334 which denies any Jewish connection to Judea, Samaria and Jerusalem. This ironically ocurred under a “Jewish” PM.
The NZ Labour Party is itching to embrace Palestine and its associated terror affiliates.
Ignorance combined with prejudice, electoral considerations and an unwillingness to confront plain old Jew hate has unfortunately taken hold of the political scene in Aotearoa.
Not a promising outlook.
Be interesting to know, as a follow up – what was the response from Hipkins re this?