Israel reservists step up demos against judicial change
Protests against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s judicial overhaul have intensified with demonstrations across Israel as a retired air force general said 161 of the corps’ reserve officers had vowed to no longer report for duty.
Israelis protest plans by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government to overhaul the judicial system, in Tel Aviv, Israel, Tuesday, July 11, 2023. Israelis opposed to the overhaul plan held a series of demonstrations across the country. The demonstrations on Tuesday came hours after Netanyahu’s parliamentary coalition gave initial approval to a bill to limit the Supreme Court’s oversight powers.(AP Photo/Ohad Zwigenberg)
The officers, with ranks ranging from major to brigadier-general, notified the military of their decision over the last three days and would publish a joint statement – with names redacted – on Wednesday, Asaf Agmon told Reuters.
The drive by Netanyahu’s nationalist-religious coalition to change the justice system and curb some Supreme Court power has sparked unprecedented protests, bruised the economy and stirred concern for Israel’s democratic health among allies.
Some reservists have threatened not to heed call-up orders as part of the protest.
That has jarred a country for which the conscript military, which draws on reserves in wartime and requires they undergo regular training, was long an apolitical issue to rally around.
“This is the most impactful military protest so far – a critical blow to air force readiness,” said Agmon, a protest organiser and former brigadier-general who, at 75, is past reserve duty age.
Reuters could not independently verify the identities of the 161 or, given that air force numbers are classified, assess the effect of such a walkout on military readiness.
Agmon described the 161 protesting reservist officers as headquarters staff who run air force operations.
Some also fly as pilots or navigators, he said.
Air force reservists regularly take part in combat operations.
As protesters took to the streets, Defence Minister Yoav Gallant appealed for unity among the ranks.
“We cannot exist in this land without the Israel Defence Forces,” he said at a memorial ceremony speech.
From the early hours of Tuesday, thousands rallied across the country, many waving Israeli flags.
Protesters blocked at least half a dozen highways, staged demonstrations at major train stations in the afternoon rush hour and entered the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange, tossing fake banknotes as symbols of corruption.
Police officers deployed on horseback and used water cannons to disperse some of the protesters who had blocked roads during the night.
At least 45 people were arrested, police said.
With the prime minister wielding a comfortable Knesset majority, opponents are hoping a fresh wave of protest can help scupper the legislation before final voting next week.
The government is pushing to pass the law that would curb the Supreme Court’s ability to void government and minister decisions or appointments by stripping the judges of the power to deem such decisions “unreasonable”.
It aims to pass the law before a July 30 Knesset recess.
Netanyahu, who is on trial for corruption charges he denies, has defended the proposed changes, vowing to keep “Israel a Jewish and democratic nation-state, free and liberal, that holds sacrosanct majority rule alongside civil rights”.
At a memorial speech in Jerusalem, he said his government was proceeding in a responsible and measured manner, seeking as broad an agreement as it can to restore balance between the judiciary, legislature and executive.
Proponents of the changes say the Supreme Court has become too interventionist and that the change will facilitate effective governance.
Opponents say the change will weaken the Supreme Court, which in a country that has no constitution and a one-chamber parliament that is dominated by the government – has a critical role in protecting civil rights and liberties.
AAP
Governments that lose the support of the defence force have to consider their future in a democracy as a “wounded” government..