Australia ‘abandons’ ally after Middle East UN vote

December 4, 2024 by AAP J-Wire
Read on for article

Australia’s vote at the United Nations backing the call for Israel to withdraw from occupied Palestinian Territories has marked a deepening rift with the US, as Labor stands accused of selling out the Jewish community for votes.

The United Nations building in New York City. Credit: Wikimedia Commons.

The nation joined 157 countries to support the resolution, while eight voted against it, including the US and Israel.

It urged Israel to “bring to an end its unlawful presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory as rapidly as possible” while recognising the “inalienable rights of the Palestinian people, primarily the right to self-determination and the right to their independent state”.

Australia’s ambassador to the UN James Larsen told the General Assembly the position reflected growing international momentum.

“A two-state solution remains the only hope of breaking the endless cycle of violence, the only hope to see a secure and prosperous future for both peoples,” he said.

But Opposition Leader Peter Dutton said Australia’s stance was done so for domestic political gain.

“There was a lot of anger, understandably … with the way in which the government has sold out the Jewish community,” he told reporters in Sydney on Wednesday.

“The prime minister stands condemned. Because when you ask yourself, why would the government, why would the prime minister sacrifice his credibility … it’s for votes.”

Following Hamas’ October 7 attack on Israel, fighting has widened in the region from Gaza to include Lebanon, Yemen and Iran.

Opposition foreign spokesman Simon Birmingham blasted the Albanese government for putting Australia “at odds” with the US and for having “abandoned a key democratic ally in Israel”.

“Overnight, Labor has changed longstanding Australian positions at the United Nations in votes that will not protect a single civilian in the Middle East, prevent further terrorist attacks or release a single hostage still held by Hamas,” he said.

In October, the coalition split from the US on the issue, disagreeing with US Vice President Kamala Harris who said her administration was working to secure a ceasefire in Gaza and Lebanon.

Opposition home affairs spokesman James Paterson at the time downplayed the breakaway.

The president of the Zionist Federation of Australia, Jeremy Leibler, said: “The Government’s decision to once again distance itself from the US, our closest ally, as well as its own long-standing positions—shared by the Rudd and Gillard Governments—is deeply concerning.

This shift reflects a foreign policy approach increasingly disconnected from both the reality on the ground and Australia’s broader national interests.

The Biden Administration recently highlighted the UN’s ‘clear and persistent institutional bias’ against Israel, which undermines efforts to advance peace. It is perplexing and disappointing that our government refuses to acknowledge this undeniable reality.

These resolutions do not make one single mention of the hostages; it is fundamentally contradictory to talk about peace without calling for the unconditional release of over 100 hostages who have been sitting in the dungeons of Gaza for more than 420 days.

These resolutions won’t bring about peace, all they do is reward terrorism.”

Dr Colin Rubenstein, executive director of The Australia/Israel and Jewish Affairs Council, commented: “The Australia/Israel & Jewish Affairs Council is yet again deeply disappointed by the Australian Government’s change of vote on a UN General Assembly resolution – this one titled “Peaceful Settlement of the question of Palestine”.

AIJAC Executive Director Dr Colin Rubenstein said, “This is a resolution that puts many obligations on Israel but asks nothing of the Palestinians. It is woefully one-sided – which is why, for more than 20 years, Australian governments of all stripes have always voted no, or abstained. And this year it was made even more radical, with new demands Israel must unilaterally withdraw from all disputed territory as soon as possible without any negotiations and pay compensation to the Palestinians. This makes the Government’s decision even harder to comprehend.”

Dr Rubenstein continued, “By promising the Palestinians everything they want without imposing any obligations on them whatsoever, this resolution is simply a recipe for further conflict, not peace.

It is clearly against the conditions Senator Wong has said are necessary for a two-state peace.”

Unfortunately, we’ve come to expect half-hearted explanations by the Foreign Minister that she didn’t like some of the paragraphs in a resolution but voted for it anyway. These don’t make sense when the resolution is so directly at odds with what she has stated are the minimum requirements for peace. Further, it is odd that Australia’s Ambassador to the UN said voting for this resolution doesn’t prejudge the outcome of Israeli-Palestinian negotiations, when this resolution does exactly that. The Government can’t have its cake and eat it too.”

By: Andrew Brown/AAP with J-Wire

Speak Your Mind

Comments received without a full name will not be considered
Email addresses are NEVER published! All comments are moderated. J-Wire will publish considered comments by people who provide a real name and email address. Comments that are abusive, rude, defamatory or which contain offensive language will not be published

Got something to say about this?

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Discover more from J-Wire

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading